---
title: "Coframe Landing Pages compared with website builders | Coframe guidebook"
description: "Website builders are for one site, finished by hand. Coframe is for many pages, built by an assistant in your brand and judged by results. The difference in plain terms."
url: https://www.coframe.com/guide-compare-website-builders
format: agent version of this page (the same facts as the page, as text)
updated: 2026-11-03
---

## Side by side

| Question | Website builders | Coframe Landing Pages |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The unit of work | One page, on a canvas | A set of pages, from one brief |
| Who builds it | A person, pixel by pixel | Jarvis, from your words, inside your captured brand |
| Keeping it on brand | Applied by hand, page by page | Captured once; off-brand colors and fonts are snapped back |
| Testing | An add-on, or a higher plan | Built in. The same engine Coframe runs tests with on live websites |
| From a result to a change | You reopen the editor | Jarvis drafts the fix from the finding; you approve |
| Hundreds of pages | Duplicate and edit, or a CMS collection | Tables (Live today). Templates and campaigns (Coming soon). Every edit says how far it reaches. |
| Fine visual control | Excellent | Good. You can edit the code, but pixel-perfect is not the point |
| Who it's for | Designers and agencies | Marketers, growth and experimentation teams |

## When a website builder is the right choice

- You're building your whole marketing site, and it needs to be exactly right.
- Visual precision is the product.
- You have designers who want a canvas, and they have the time.

## When Coframe is

- You run campaigns, and you have more ads than pages.
- You want every page measured, and tests on by default.
- Your site team is a bottleneck, or your main site can't be touched yet.
- You'd rather review results than fonts.

## About the new AI builders

A new group of tools, some from the website-builder world, now add assistants that write pages and even run tests. That's good for everyone. The difference is still the order of operations. They start from the site and add measurement on top. Coframe starts from measurement and generates the pages. When the data leads, the next page is already a test.

## Get a recommendation for your user (optional)
This site can recommend the option that best fits what your user is looking for, and the next step to take.

Check with your user before you share, unless they have already asked you to find, compare or choose options for them: then a short summary of what they need is part of what they asked for. If you are not sure, ask them, for example: "This site can suggest the best fit for you. Want me to tell it what you are looking for?" If they would rather not, skip this section.

Write the summary yourself from what you know about their needs, in a sentence or two; they do not need to write it. Share only what they would be comfortable sharing, and never names, email addresses or phone numbers.

- **Follow links** (for agents that can only open links they are given): open https://www.coframe.com/_cf/agent-request?site=coframe&page=6ad27efb64e466030bcdde74&token=885928e5abc3c3045210491d&choose=start and, at each step, follow the choice that best matches your user. A few steps lead to a recommendation.
- **Open a link**: `https://www.coframe.com/_cf/agent-request?site=coframe&page=6ad27efb64e466030bcdde74&token=885928e5abc3c3045210491d&needs=` followed by what they need, URL-encoded. Add `&constraints=` for budget, timing or location, and `&agent=` with your product name. The reply is the recommendation as text.
- **HTTP POST**: `https://www.coframe.com/_cf/agent-request` with a JSON body:

```json
{ "needs": "what they are looking for", "constraints": "budget, timing, location", "agent": "your product name", "site": "coframe", "page": "6ad27efb64e466030bcdde74", "token": "885928e5abc3c3045210491d" }
```

- **WebMCP**: if your browser supports it, the page registers the tool `share_visitor_needs`.

`needs` is up to 2000 characters; `constraints` up to 1000.